No part of this Site may be reproduced in any form, without explicit written permission.
S P R I N G W O M E N, M Y T H O R R E A L I T Y ?
The problem is to determine whether these special liquids known as kalas coincide with the ejaculatory liquid or it is something different.
First of all, let us analyze the states and perception of the women who experienced such states: when experiencing an erotic state of such magnitude that it leads to the manifestation of the kalas, the women confessed a deep state of fulfillment, satisfaction, and inner contentment, doubled by an increased erotic appetite, whereas in the case of women who related ejaculatory experiences, the erotic desire decreases, and even disappears for a certain length of time.
Until recently, modern sexologists including Masters and Johnson sustained the theory according to which feminine ejaculation did not exist. However, most recent studies indicate the opposite.
The women need to know their sexual potential, because if they know it, they may apply and use it in several ways, probably the most important at the actual stage of development in our society being the therapeutic use.
Through lovemaking certain old emotional blockages can be eliminated and the woman may experience enhanced erotic pleasure.
From an esoteric point of view, the sexual feminine nectar is associated to AMRITA, the famous "immortality nectar" of the Gods, or the "water of life" known to the initiate people of the Tantra, Taoism, Sexual Magic and Inner Alchemy.
The sexual potential of the woman's body including the secretion of the sexual fluids was an important secret, revealed only to the worthy ones.
This potential, awakened through certain practices such as the control of the circulation of the sexual energy, and special mediation techniques becomes the vehicle leading one to the spiritual awakening.
The question is how can one differentiate between the two types of orgasm and consequently the two types of liquid, ejaculatory or kalas.
FEMININE EJACULATION - A DECIPHERED MYSTERY
Certain women ejaculate during a very powerful orgasm. However, the studies of this not so frequent phenomenon do not always allow the positive identification of the process that lead to the elimination of the liquid. In certain cases there are glandular secretions, in others simply the relaxation of the bladder.
What are the kalas compared to the ejaculatory liquid?
In certain exceptional moments, when the woman experiences spiritual states the subtle sexual and spiritual energy becomes material and takes the form of the famous kalas. Whatever its origin, this manifestation is the indication of a very intense and special sensuality and feminity.
The Department of Sexology of the University of Quebec, Montreal, conducted a very serious study on this matter in 1998. Small announcements were published in newspapers urging women who had such manifestations to contact the researchers.
40 women answered the announcement. Scientific caution advised the scientists to replace the term "ejaculation" with "expulsion", during the first inquiries.
The results are as follows: the feminine ejaculation, the corresponding process of male ejaculation has nothing to do with lubrication, because the women have above the urethra glands similar to the men's prostrate.
The researchers tried to determine whether the liquid eliminated by the women resembled to the prostate liquid. If this theory proved correct, the volume of the eliminated liquid could not surpass the volume-capacity of these glands.
In order to establish a relationship between the feminine and masculine ejaculation, the researchers have agreed on the fact that both the quantities and the quality of the examined liquids are similar.
Another theory on feminine expulsion refers to a possible relaxation of the bladder. Usually the feminine orgasm is followed up by a deep relaxation of the pelvic area, which may determine a small quantity of urine to pass through.
The researchers have analyzed the samples brought in by the women subject to the study, and the results were quite controversial. They researchers did not have enough genuine material to work upon, because in the lab only two of the women masturbated and allowed the liquid to be analyzed.